
UPDATE: It’s Saturday, August 15th, 2009, and I’ve just read this post after seeing it show up on a list of search engine terms. Maybe it’s age, maybe it’s being away from school, maybe it’s something else; but I don’t agree with most of what I’ve written here. I read jPod shortly after this and, while I was annoyed by some of the Coupland-isms I write about here, I finally “got” it. I went on a mad quest talking to former professors and reviewers of Coupland’s books trying to figure out what happened; but I didn’t get many satisfactory answers. Then I realized that it was my fault. I was reading these books the wrong way&mdashltrying to apply years of (mostly) useless literary theory and criticisms. I should have just read them.
Her time with the disease had, to her surprise, made her feel less lost.
Confession
I live in Vancouver, I work in publishing, and I don’t like Douglas Coupland’s novels. This usually causes a mildly angry discussion that requires an explanation as to WHY I don’t like them. Normally this leads to regionalism, which is great because THAT argument is only two words: “George Bowering“. Sometimes it leads to commentary on on modern life/culture, which is great because THAT argument is only three words: “Bret Easton Ellis“.
Time
Without a doubt, I spent more time thinking about why I didn’t like “Families” as I was reading it than I actually spent reading it. I tried to like it, I really did. The first 50 pages were incredibly enjoyable – unfortunately, the last 200+ pages were agonizing. I felt like I was wasting my time.
Janet
Janet is the matriarch of the story. She’s a 65 year old woman who has contracted HIV from her son, Wade, because HER EX-HUSBAND SHOT HER. What? Yes, her ex-husband – Ted – shot her, Wade intercepted the bullet, and the it went right through him into her sternum. Wade, the story’s lout son, contracted HIV the regular way – irresponsible sex (kudos for making him heterosexual).
I like Janet. She’s a bit absurd at the beginning – more of a caricature than a character – but she grew on me. She’s also the speaker of the quote up at the top. As a tangent, I read Coupland’s “Shampoo Planet” during a phase where I made A LOT of margin notes. By the time I’d finished it, there was ONE sentence underlined with a note saying “this is the only worthwhile sentence of the entire book”. I’ve since given my copy away, but it was the scene where the main character gave a guy a hug and made the comment that it was the hug he SHOULD have given someone he knew growing up. Poignant. Anyhow, Janet has some wonderful moments in the book and I’m glad to have met her.
The Ending
The ending is awful. The one hope I was clinging to was that everyone would end up dead. Wade’s HIV would turn into full blown AIDS and be stricken down by an infection, Ted’s liver cancer would spread to the rest of his body and live a deservedly crappy end-of-life, Sarah’s – the daughter/astronaut with one hand because of pre-natal, thalidomide-induced mutation (what happened to THAT storyline?) – space craft would blow up, and the rest of them – who really don’t even deserve to have individual names – would have something horrible happen to them. But no, no that didn’t happen. Janet becomes friends with Florian – a smuggler that Wade used to work for and also the owner of the largest pharmaceutical company in the world – who has recently met this Ugandan woman, Cissy, with an immunity to HIV; by holding their mutual open cuts to each other, Janet’s HIV is healed. Not only that, but so is Nickie’s (Ted’s new trophy wife, Wade slept with her – the reason Ted shot him – and gave her HIV), and Ted’s liver cancer. Then Janet heals Wade’s HIV by doing the same thing less than a day later!
But how does it ACTUALLY finish? Wade is going to find God and show Him to everyone. Sarah is (hopefully) going to conceive in space with her Captain, even though she is married to Howie who has cheated on her with at least two women – one of them being Cissy. Oh, and Janet has cut off her hair. So Wade is making a ridiculously uncharacteristic change, Sarah is continuing on her not-enough-personality-to-be-a-good-character way, and Janet is acting like she did at the beginning of the novel. The journey she took by dealing with her illness, accepting it, and living life the way she wanted to live it seems like a bit of a waste. So she’s lost again, and it’s because she’s not sick. She’s 65, disease-free, and yet she’s lost like she was in chapter one. Hyper sigh.
The Truth
In all frank honesty, I think Coupland is a weak writer and that’s why I don’t like his novels. I thoroughly enjoy his Souvenir of Canada books, and that really makes sense in regards to his life as a regionalist. It’s obvious that he knows his region, and he knows of ways to artistically present a unique vision of his surroundings. But can he write a novel? I’d argue against that. I think he got incredibly lucky with “Generation X: Tales for an Accelerated Generation” – a book I couldn’t read more than 4 chapters of before I put down – and tapped into a zeitgeist that my generation, and the one right before it, hasn’t forgotten about. The apathetic generation wasn’t going to criticize his writing, and were going to relate to the utter blanks that populated the book as characters.
Technicals
The entire book is awash with unnecessary metaphors and throwaway sentences. One of the concepts behind speed-reading is seeing groups of words as a single entity and removing the need to read each word. I found myself breezing my way through entire paragraphs and not missing a beat. When I read, I tend to scan the paragraph, determine if I’ve understood it, then decide if I need to actually READ the paragraph. This never really happened in “Families”. I re-read A LOT of paragraphs, but I never HAD to. Every re-read ended with an moment of “oh, I guess I didn’t miss anything” and some confusion as to why there is so much filler.
The Characters
I LOVE hating characters. I think it’s a show of great writing to make a completely despicable character that your readers end up rooting for and smiling about. With the exception of the post-beginning, pre-ending Janet, I really just wanted bad things to happen to everyone in this book. Not even because I didn’t like them, but because I nothing’d them. There’s a character named Shw, who’s an environmental terrorist – PERFECT fodder for my newest literary crush – but completely transparent outside of that short description. She is SELLING HER BABY FOR PROFIT, and was still one of the least interesting things I’ve encountered. The bumbling Ted and Bryan were bad Carl Hiaasen knock-offs (the fact that the story took place in Florida does not help this comparison), and the super villian-esque Florian, who IS actually a likable guy in the book, is simply a drug hallucination. Imagine every instance of a character being presented like that weird drugged up chapter near the end of Hannibal, but without the drugs and cannibalism. To be fair, “Families” DID have a lot of drugs, but they were mainly immuno-suppressants.
Done
So that’s it. I’m done with Douglas Coupland novels. The only reason I picked this one up was because 1) I felt it was time to give him another chance, and 2) it was in a box labeled “Free Books” and I didn’t want to read Ken Follett*. I think I’ve read enough of his work to validly say “I just don’t like him”.
* Funny story: I was in Chapters a few years ago when this girl told me that Ken Follett’s Pillars of the Earth was the best book in the world. By coincidence, I was able to grab MY favourite book off the shelf and say “no, THIS is the best book in the world. I ended up buying a used copy of Pillars the next month for a buck. A buck!